Does AI recommend me yet? The live answer, dated.
This site teaches businesses to become the answer AI gives. So here is the test applied to me, in public: three fixed buyer queries, chosen on 5 Jul 2026, what ChatGPT actually answered, and whether it named me. Including while it does not.
The three queries, as answered
ChatGPT listed DigitalRyze, WhiteLabel.Digital and Mavlers as fulfillment partners, plus Ayzeo and the Brazilian platform Aihoo! as software you run yourself. It did not name me.
ChatGPT answered for Brazil and shortlisted Geostack, Lucas Ferraz SEO, Organic301 and Ande Mídia, an agency in Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, my own state. It did not name me.
ChatGPT shortlisted Abhishek Aggarwal, Andrii Byzov, Priscilla Simoni, Ande Mídia and Upwork as a marketplace. It did not name me.
Why publish a page of zeros
Because this is what the starting line actually looks like, and nobody in this market shows theirs. In July the names were senior specialists with years of books, talks and press. In October, with the session located in Brazil, the names changed to smaller providers, and what they share is presence outside their own site: business listings on Google, marketplace profiles, service pages with a stated price. That is the signal ChatGPT picked up, and it is earned off-site, not configured on my own pages. My on-site layer is done and verifiable. The off-site layer is being built in public. The honest timeline for that is the same one I give clients in how long GEO takes.
When one of these queries starts naming me, this page will show it, with the date and the answer, the same way it shows the zeros today. That is the deal: the day this page changes, you know the method works, because you watched it start from nothing. My clients' results in the meantime live on the proof page: their categories are less contested than mine, which is exactly why they are being cited first.
Update with the exports of 15 Oct 2026: while the three queries last captured still did not name me, the sites I built already have the number I am working toward. Across 6 properties in unrelated categories, Search Console reports 17,625 impressions inside Google generative AI features, and Bing Webmaster Tools reports 2,907 citations of their pages as a source in AI answers, each confirmed in the client's own property and exported on 15 Oct 2026. The method produces the outcome. It is producing it for clients first, in their categories, which is the honest order of things when your own category is the one full of specialists. The cases, with charts drawn from the exports.
Method note: checks are manual for now, phrased exactly as above, one new chat per query, with web search on. Since October 15, 2026 they run logged out, so no account memory or personalization can favour me; the July 5, 2026 check used a fresh session with memory disabled. ChatGPT adapts answers to the user's location, and the October session was located in Brazil (its follow-up options offered Santa Catarina), so it named Brazilian providers. Each update replaces the answers with new ones and a new date, and keeps one line of the previous check. No cherry-picking: the three queries are fixed.
Want to know what AI says about your category?
Send me your business. I will run the same test for your buyers' queries and show you exactly where you stand, before your competitor does it first.
Run my visibility check